ताज्या घडामोडी

MK Stalin Backs CJP Protests, Rules Out Cooperation With Congress

लेखक: Bhandara Today पब्लिश तारीख: 18 Oct 2026, 06:37 AM अपडेट: 18 Oct 2026, 06:37 AM
MK Stalin Backs CJP Protests, Rules Out Cooperation With Congress
MK Stalin Backs CJP Protests, Rules Out Cooperation With Congress
*DMK signals support for anti-SIR demonstrations as differences with Congress raise questions about future opposition unity.** **CHENNAI, October 18, 2026:** Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (DMK) president MK Stalin has expressed support for protests against the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls and Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar. At the same time, the party has made clear that it does not intend to participate in activities alongside the Congress, according to the report. The political position emerged during a meeting of DMK Members of Parliament chaired by Stalin on Saturday. The meeting discussed electoral roll revision, voting methods and the party's approach to the ongoing protests. DMK Calls for Changes to Electoral Process The meeting adopted a resolution calling for the removal of Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar, the withdrawal of SIR and the restoration of ballot paper voting. The party also expressed support for student-led demonstrations and other movements opposing the electoral roll revision. DMK leaders criticised the Congress, accusing it of taking credit for a movement that gained momentum through the participation of students and young people. The party also questioned the Congress's position on SIR in different states. ## Support for CJP and Student Protesters The DMK has extended support to the Cockroach Janta Party (CJP) protests and other groups opposing SIR. However, DMK MP A. Raja clarified that CJP has not yet become a political party, while acknowledging the possibility that it could develop into a political force in the future. Party leaders have also spoken out against the detention of protesters. Stalin criticised the reported detention of CJP founder Abhijeet Dipke and other activists, calling for their release and opposing restrictions on peaceful demonstrations. In statements shared on social media, Stalin said the DMK was prepared to provide legal assistance to protesters. The party has maintained that young people should be able to raise their concerns without facing unjustified restrictions. ## Possibility of a New Political Front According to the report, the DMK has been exploring the possibility of working with CJP and regional leaders to build a broader political front. However, it remains unclear whether these discussions will result in a formal alliance or cooperation limited to specific issues. Any such development could affect relations among opposition parties and influence political strategies ahead of upcoming Assembly elections. The DMK's outreach may also represent an effort to strengthen its connection with younger voters. ## Delimitation and Women's Reservation Also Discussed The party's meeting also addressed concerns about delimitation and proposed women's reservation legislation. Stalin reportedly told MPs that the DMK would respond to the delimitation issue when it comes before Parliament. The DMK has been a vocal critic of the proposed delimitation exercise. Meanwhile, the report suggests that discussions between the central government and the party could become politically significant because of the DMK's parliamentary representation. ## Political Differences Continue The latest developments highlight growing disagreements between the DMK and Congress over the anti-SIR campaign and the broader direction of opposition politics. For now, the DMK's support for the protests is clear, but the future of any proposed political partnership remains uncertain. Further announcements from the parties involved will determine whether these discussions lead to a new alliance or remain focused on electoral reform. *Editorial note: This article is based on the supplied report. Verify political statements, detention details, party positions and the status of any proposed alliance against reliable, current sources before publication.